« 'G.O.P. = Gridlock, Obstruction & Paralysis' Meme Gets Legs | Main | Hoosier Shocker »

ShareThis

Obama's Two-Front Offensive on Health Reform

It's been obvious for a while that in forcing congressional Republicans to attend a presidential summit on health care reform on February 25, the president is trying to place them on the horns of a dilemma: they must either admit they don't have their own "plan," or must advance a "plan" that could be very unpopular (viz. vouchering Medicare). More generally, Obama is trying to create a broader political context in which Americans compare the agendas of the two parties, instead of treating the November elections as an up-or-down referendum on the administration's policies or, worse yet, on feelings about the political and economic condition of the country. The president is also seeking the deepen the growing sentiment that he's been a lot more "bipartisan" than the opposition.

But it's also likely that Obama is using the summit to push congressional Democrats to get their own act together before it's too late. The formal announcement of the summit indicates that the White House will in advance post on the internet a plan that meets the administration's criteria for reform. Here's how Jonathan Cohn analyzes the implications of that statement:

That passage seems to suggest one of the following is true:

1) House and Senate leadership have nearly finished negotiating a new compromise version of their legislation. The text the administration plans to post will reflect that compromise.

2) House and Senate leadership are still struggling to come to an agreement, if not over what to pass then in what sequence to pass it. The administration hopes this promise will force them to wrap things up.

In other words, Obama could be engaging in a two-front offensive: forcing action by Democrats to complete or revive their own health reform negotiations, on pain of looking like fools on February 25, while compelling Republicans to choose the path of open obstruction or of perilous conservative ideology.

With the summit being just ten days away, the White House isn't affording either party a whole lot of time to make these fateful choices. But one thing seems to be sure: by February 25, there will finally be a plan on the table that merits the much-abused term "ObamaCare."

3 Comments

| Leave a comment

The Republicans, with their undeniable skill at coining catchy sound bites are fighting back with demands that the debate start from "a clean sheet of paper" or "start from scratch" because the American people have already rejected the bills passed by congress.

Yes, from a substantive point of view this notion is bullshit, but it can still make some ideological flowers grow.

Dems have to respond with a clear, concise, unified answer -- "Bring your plan"


Bring your plan and let's see how many people it will cover

Bring your plan and let's see how much it costs

Bring your plan and let's see what it does to the deficit

If you don't like our plan, bring your plan

Or is obstruction the only plan you really have to offer?

Or don't come at all, and and REALLY look extreme. And whiny, too, since the only defense would have to be "the President's trying to trick us, it's a trap, he's being mean to us." It reminds me of the episode on "The West Wing" where Bartlett walks to Capitol Hill while the Republicans are meeting, and the Speaker won't let him into the meeting until they come up with a strategy. After they've let the POTUS who has come to THEM cool his heels in the corridor for awhile, he leaves. They look terrible: disorganized and/or rude and disrespectful to his office.

I love your optimism, Ed. That's what I come here for. However, at this point we still have to *read* a lot of coherence into everything the administration does since we haven't seen any actual coherence in reality so far. It would be cool to think Obama is waging a two-front war here. However, until I see some sort of traction, I'll assume the summit is nothing more than the latest attempt to pull a magical rabbit of bipartisanship out of a hat.

The Democratic Strategist's comments section welcomes intelligent discussion and debate from individuals representing every sector of the Democratic community.

Because of the spam problem, the first time you leave a comment you will have to sign up for a username by filling out a brief form. This just takes about two minutes and after that you will always be able to join the discussion just using your username and password.

Also, please note that all comments must be expressed in a mature and civil tone of voice. Individuals posting rude or otherwise inappropriate material will lose their access to the discussion.

Thank You, TDS staff

Leave a comment