« Campaign '06 Wrap-Ups Everywhere | Main | Middle Class Roundtable Continues »

Immigration Still Huge Issue in Many Districts

Democrats should not be lulled into anything less than full attention to the issue of immigration in mid-term campaigns by reports that Congress will not be addressing the issue before the election. So says Carl Hulse in his New York Times piece "In Bellwether District, G.O.P. Runs on Immigration." Hulse spotlights CO-7, encompassing Aurora, Colorado, where the immigration issue is particularly hot, but says:

And while Congress is unlikely to enact major immigration legislation before November, inaction does not make the issue any less potent in campaigning. In fact, many Republicans, on the defensive here and around the country over the war in Iraq, say they are finding that a hard-line immigration stance resonates not just with conservatives, who have been disheartened on other fronts this year, but also with a wide swath of voters in districts where control of the House could be decided.

Hulse provides no opinion polling data to indicate constituent sentiment in the district or nation-wide. However, the most recent polls by Newsweek/Princeton Survey Research, Fox News/Opinion Dynamics and the L.A. Times/Bloomberg give the Democrats a slight edge in public confidence on immigration. Yet Hulse sees many GOP candidates emphasizing a hard line, in contrast to the Administration's position:

“Immigration is an issue that is really popping, “ said Dan Allen, a Republican strategist. “It is an issue that independents are paying attention to as well. It gets us talking about security and law and order.”

Leading Republicans, leery of a compromise on immigration, are encouraging their candidates to keep the focus on border control, as in legislation passed by the House, rather than accept a broader bill that would also clear a path for many illegal immigrants to gain legal status. The latter approach, approved by the Senate with overwhelming Democratic support and backed by the White House, makes illegal immigration one of the issues on which Republicans face a tough choice of standing by President Bush or taking their own path.

“The American people want a good illegal-immigration-reform bill,” said Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, the House majority leader, “not a watered-down, pro-amnesty bill.”

None of which is to say that Dems can't gain advantage with Hispanic voters in particular, or even voters in general, by taking a more conciliatory position. We can be sure only, that the issue will be raised by GOP candidates going forward to November 7.

Comments

Isn't this missing the point? We are not talking about "top level" issues.

GOPers and Independents might just go out and vote this issue whereas it is unlikely the Dems will.

see http://www.eyeon08.com/2006/09/02/for-the-gop-the-war-is-the-only-issue/ for details.

But this is an election about motivating voters, not persuading the general electorate.

A hard-line on immigration could help the GOPers. Just look inside the polls, not the top lines. Details at:

http://www.eyeon08.com/2006/09/06/immigration-as-an-issue-in-2006/

Do the posters or commenters on this site have polling data to illustrate how this issue plays with Latinos? I've read about voter registration efforts by immigrant rights groups. Are they successful? How many new voters have they signed up?

The immigration issue could break both ways. In California, anti-immigrant measures caused real harm to the GOP by convincing Hispanic voters that the GOP doesn't support them.

Immigration is tough one for us Democrats: on the one hand giving our full attention and support to the hispanic community may win us more support from that part of the population - but illegal immigrants are ILLEGAL! It puts us in the position of looking weak when it comes to law and order. Plus these people ARE taking jobs from hard working LEGAL citiznes and underminding the labor movement in this country by giving employers the option of hiring illegals for low wages and minimal benefits rather than skilled union workers.

Post a comment

Posting Policy

The Democratic Strategist's comments section welcomes intelligent discussion and debate from individuals representing every sector of the Democratic community.

Because of the spam problem, the first time you leave a comment you will have to sign up for a username by filling out a brief form. This just takes about two minutes and after that you will always be able to join the discussion just using your username and password.

Also, please note that all comments must be expressed in a mature and civil tone of voice. Individuals posting rude or otherwise inappropriate material will lose their access to the discussion.

Thank You, TDS staff

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?